classic book, The End of Liberalism, seeks to address this intrigue. Lowi feels that the interplay of interests in what he describes quite appropriately as, "interest group liberalism," falls far short of achieving what he feels to be the over all public good-a concept that he believes to both tangible and knowable.
In our view, without getting into a deep philosophical discussion of Plato and his belief that such a Good could be understood and imparted as part of a program to reform society, Lowi's belief is at best a utopian one; or at worst a dystopian idea that can lead to the violent wrenching of societal institutions in the service of political reconstruction animated by such "ideals."
In reality, we not only believe that the public interest is achieved through the rough and tumble of competing interests in a democratic market place of ideas and interests, we also don't think that there is any transcendent Good that can or should be imposed on a society-and the concept always falls on the question of just who can be relied on to devise the notion of the Good. Or, more pointedly, who's got the chops for being so far above and better than all of the rest of us, that we can cede to this special someone the role of Arbiter.
This is, by the way, a fairly long digression into a discussion of the news this morning that NYPIRG-better known as the New York Public Interest Group-has taken umbrage at the way in which the Save New York coalition has organized itself: "The group is organized as a not for profit, which under the rules, does not have to disclose donors. As long as it's not actively endorsing specific legislation, it also does not have to register as a lobbying entity with the state ethics panel. But government reform groups questioned that status. Blair Horner, with the New York Public Interest Research Group, says the committee, is raising and spending millions of dollars, with the intent of promoting the specifics of the governor's agenda, it's website provides a link to e-mail state legislators, and it's even hired a lobbyist. "If you walk like a duck and you quack like a duck, it's a duck," said Horner."
Let's clear the air on this. The idea that NYPIRG should arrogate to itself the mantle of reform is as credible as the group's claim-embedded in the organization's name-to be speaking in the public interest. In reality, the groups has a distinctively liberal and anti-business agenda that serves some interests but abjures others-and in our thirty years of observing these folks we have never, that's never as in nunca, advocated on behalf of business-any business.
Now, we are not saying-as the oft and wrongly quoted Charles Wilson of GM once said-that was is good for GM is naturally also good for America. But we also believe that somewhere embedded in the concept of public interest, is the idea that business prosperity is at the very least a contributing factor to its achievement. So, NYPIRG's haughty expropriation of the term, given its hostility to commerce of any kind, is an affront-and the media should be wary of categorizing the group as anything but a liberal interest organization.
The NY Post captures this in its editorial today-and hits at NYPIRG"s hypocrisy in attacking the SNY committee as well: "So the committee's enemies -- backed by an ostensible voice of reform, the New York Public Interest Research Group, and other so-called good-government groups -- are muttering about a supposed unholy secret alliance between the new governor and the business community. "It appears that they are coordinating with the governor and they are doing this to help the governor and maybe even at the request of the governor," complained NYPIRG's Blair Horner. "We don't know who's involved in this." Actually, much more is known about who's involved in the Committee to Save New York than about who funds NYPIRG -- which isn't required to disclose its funding sources, and doesn't."
And we have a glimmer of an idea that NYPIRG's sticklishness over SNY's disclosures can actually be traced to the "reform" group's hostility to both SNY's and the governor's agenda. As the Post points out: "But the larger issue isn't who's financing efforts to aid Cuomo in his bid to bring New York's runaway spending and taxes under control -- it's who's already busy organizing to fight him. Polls suggest the public strongly supports the governor's efforts. But the special interests spend millions every year fighting responsible state government; this year will be no different. Which is why Cuomo needs -- and deserves -- all the help he can get."
The whole question of what is in the public interest is an intriguing one-and Theodore Lowi's - Greenspan's Cult of Personality... Review topics and articles of economics: Alan Greenspan was a legend in his time and there was no shortage of praise for him back then. For example, who can forget Bob Woodow's 2000 book Maestro: Greenspan's...
- Yes Tyler, Low Interest Rates Matte... Tyler Cowen is wondering whether the Fed's low interest rates in the early-to-mid 2000s really were that important to the credit and housing boom of the early-to-mid...
- The Eurozone Crisis: Deja Vu... Review topics and articles of economics: Randal Forsyth sees similarities between the current unfolding of the Eurozone crisis and that of the U.S. financial crisis a few years back:Just as the problem on this...
- Charles Plosser and the Burden of F... The Economist's Free Exchange blog is shocked to hear this from Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia President Charles Plosser:"Since expectations play an important role...
- Arnold Kling and Expected Inflation... Review topics and articles of economics: What do we know about expected inflation? According to Arnold Kling not much if we look to financial markets:I'm also not convinced that we can read expected inflation...
- A Paper on Stabilizing Nominal Spen... Given the recent discussion on stabilizing nominal spending as a policy goal I found this article by Evan F. Koenig of the Dallas Fed to be interesting: The article...
- Why The Low Interest Rates Mattered... Review topics and articles of economics: This is the second of two posts detailing why the Fed's low interest rate policies in the early-to-mid 2000s was one of the more important contributors to the credit and...
- Why The Low Interest Rates Mattered... This is the first of a two-part follow up to my previous post, where I argued that the Fed's low interest rate policy was a key contributor to the credit and housing...
- The Stance of Monetary Policy Via t... Review topics and articles of economics: There has been some interesting conversations on the stance of monetary policy in the past few days between Arnold Kling, Scott Sumner, and Josh Hendrickson. Part of...
- Scott Sumner's New Best Friend:... Joseph Gagnon is calling for $6 trillion more in global monetary easing. This should not be too hard to implement since the Fed is a monetary superpower.Update: The...
0 comments:
Post a Comment