An expert on United States law on intellectual property tells me a National Academy of Sciences study found empirical evidence suggesting the answer is "Yes" to the question in the post title. Presumably, he was referring more to the former than the latter of:I've downloaded the executive summaries, but I doubt I will purchase these reports.
Apparently if I go longer between posts, commentators will have more to say on each one.
Popular Posts
-
A key objective of QE2 is to raise nominal spending. Given sticky prices and excess economic capacity, this increase in nominal spending wo... -
This is the way capitalism is supposed to work. The weak go under, merge, or get swallowed up. It does not cost anyone a dime. The New York ...
-
As the NY Times is reporting , a federal judge has kicked the city in the butt over those gruesome cigarette signs: "A federal judge on...
-
We, as always, have been far from reticent in deconstructing Mike Bloomberg's magical economic mystery tour-something that, in our vie...
-
We begin the New Year as we left the old one-speculating on how much the mayor has been wounded by the twin catastrophes that walloped his a...
-
I'm thinking about posting on: Recent empirical results on the labor theory of value A collection of recent papers from Ian Steedman dem...
-
Well, Sarah, I'm calling you a liar. And not even a good one. Trig Paxson Van Palin is not your son. He is your grandson. The Daily Kos ...
-
Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer likens economy to depressions of 1837, 1873, and 1929 Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer sketch...
-
Scott Sumner on the efficacy of monetary policy even when the policy interest rate hit zero: Zero rates don’t really make monetary policy m... -
Samuel Brittan is not the only one in the UK who thinks stabilizing total nominal spending should be the objective of monetary policy. Gile...
Review topics and articles of economics © 2011 Do Patents And Copyrights Spur Innovation?
0 comments:
Post a Comment